AWRA SoCal Section Monthly Newsletter:  April 2006
 
Dinner Meeting Announcement
 
April 12th- 2nd Wednesday - Thousand Oaks
at Calleguas Municipal Water District Board Room
(at 2100 E. Olsen Rd., Thousand Oaks)
 
Cost:  $20 - Pay at the Door ($10 - Students)
 
Make Reservations
 
Please reply by E-mail to make reservations by Tuesday April 11th to Kelly Rowe
 
6 -Social / 7 -Dinner/ 8 -Presentations
 
April Topics:  (1) Progress on Update - Ventura County Fox Canyon Aquifer Groundwater Management Agency (GMA) Plan & (2) Use of Available Ventura County Ocean Outfalls for Eastern Ventura County Brine Disposal
 
Speakers: (1) David Panaro, RG, Groundwater Manager for the County of Ventura & (2) Don Kendall, PhD, PE, General Manager, Calleguas Municipal Water District
 
Please reply by E- Mail to make reservations by Tuesday April 11th to Kelly Rowe
Free/Open/Welcome for non-dinner folks.
 
At-Cost Low:  $20 - Pay at the door.
 
How to Get to Meeting - in (eastern) Thousand Oaks near CA Route 23 Freeway, between the 118 and 101 Freeways.
Directions Northbound on 23 Freeway:
Exit Olsen Road. Turn right at the end of the off-ramp onto Olsen Road.  Drive about 1/2-mile west up to Hardy Lane.  The Calleguas MWD Board Room is located up the hill
on the left about 1/4 mile.
Directions Southbound on 23 Freeway:
Exit Olsen Road. Turn left at the end of the off-ramp onto Olsen Road.  Drive about 1/2-mile west up to Hardy Lane.  The Calleguas MWD Board Room is located up the hill on the left about 1/4 mile.
Newsletter - Contents:
Brief AWRA SoCal Section Description
Description of Current & Upcoming 2nd Weds Monthly Dinner Meetings
Regular Newsletter Columns - First, This Month & Last Month
(Recent Issues/News, Topics for This Month, Pearls/Links to Presentations Last Month)
 
This message sent by e-mail monthly to over 2,500 water resources folks in Southern California.  Please forward to your interested friends in the Ventura County and west LA County areas, who want to know about successful water resources management.
 
AWRA Southern California Section (6th Year)
From - San Luis Obispo & Bakersfield to San Diego & Blythe
 
This is another of the Many Monthly Dinner Meetings for the American Water Resources Association (AWRA) SoCal Section - E-Mail Newsletter & Open Monthly Meetings for All Southern California's Water Resources Technical Professionals- from Academia, Government & Consulting and Other Interested Folks.
 
The strength and importance of AWRA lies with its membership. Individuals participating in our events share their interests, what they know, and meet other water-resources folks and gain better trust and understanding.  There is no substitute for meeting with another human being face-to-face and make a connection.  Phone calls, FAXes, voicemail and e-mail can only do so much good for communicating with each other.  You are welcome to actively participate in a variety of roles in the AWRA SoCal Section events, or merely be a passive observer if you are too busy or so inclined.
 
Purpose:  Improve communications and contacts with other professionals.  Promote sharing and understanding the vastly increasing amounts of technical information.  Our mission is for...
"Making Connections with California's Water People and Ideas!"
 
Basic Program for Dinner Meetings
 
6:00 p.m. - Social Hour (Meet Other Folks Interested in Water)
 
7:00 p.m. - Dinner (Cost: $20/person or $10/student w/ current ID)
 
8:00 p.m. - Presentations on Two Current Water Resources Issues
 
(You are welcome to attend presentations without having dinner, for free.)
 
For more information check our section's web site at http://www.awra.org/state/socal/ or to get on the e-mail newsletter distribution list contact, Kelly Rowe, 2001-2006 - AWRA SoCal Section President, by e-mail at: krowe@ix.netcom.com
 
As a non-profit volunteer organization your cost to participate will be kept to the absolute minimum to meet expenses and to allow inclusion of any interested people. Free, or low-cost, meeting locations are being sought.  We plan to frequently use meeting rooms at local universities or government offices.
 
First-of-the-Month E-Mail Newsletter
Rotating Monthly Dinner Meetings (2nd Wed.) with speakers on two topics (Double Features)
Development and Maintenance of the AWRA SoCal Section Website (Send in your links & web pages on subjects!)
Special Events - Saturday Workshops on Water Issues, Field Trips & Potential Annual Conferences.
 
Upcoming Monthly Dinner Meetings
(Mark your calendar for the 2nd Wednesday of Month)
 
Plans for two topics per meeting to attract academic, government & consulting water resources folks.  (We can use your help by providing your ideas and links to water resources web sites for inclusion on our site.)
 
April 12, 2006 - Thousand Oaks, Calleguas Municipal Water District Board Room
April Topics:  (1) Progress on Update - Ventura County Fox Canyon Aquifer Groundwater Management Agency (GMA) Plan & (2) Use of Available Ventura County Ocean Outfalls for Eastern Ventura County Brine Disposal
Speakers: (1) David Panaro, RG, Groundwater Manager for the County of Ventura & (2) Don Kendall, PhD, PE, General Manager, Calleguas Municipal Water District
 
May 10, 2006 - Monterey, During ACWA Conference at U.S. Naval Postgraduate School (working on it)
Water-Awareness Month
Topics:  (1) The State Water Project - Peripheral Canal:  Time to Do It - It Makes More Sense than Ever & 
(2) Can Ocean Desalting be a Solution to Our New-Needed Water Supplies if there is Not Enough Energy?
Speakers: Working on it...Volunteers?
 
June 14, 2006 - Pasadena, CalTech Area
Topics:  San Gabriel Valley Water Resources Issues - Holistic Basin Management & Water Supplies
Speakers: Working on it...Volunteers?
 
July 12, 2006 - Riverside Area
Topics:  Santa Ana River Watershed - Perchlorate Mysteries...
Speakers: Working on it...Volunteers?
 
Future Meetings?: Ideas are welcome for the location and nature of future Monthly Meetings and Special Weekend Workshops...contact Kelly at krowe@ix.netcom.com or Ken at ksusilo@geosyntec.com. Note: the above schedule and meeting locations can change.
 
Regular Columns - First, This Month and Last Month
 
First - Some interesting developments in water resources policies/activities in Southern California.  In January, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Met) almost hired former CA Assemblyman Richard Katz, as their new General Manager/CEO.  He just completed his Gray Davis-appointment-term on the board of the State Water Resources Board.  There was a tremendous flurry of Katz-campaigning by the City of LA and support by the City of San Diego Met representatives.  Then the LA Times printed a few articles before the board vote, proving Katz had strong ties with Cadiz, a company that is intensely interested in getting Met to invest in its conjunctive use project with Colorado River water.  Cadiz has had strong ties with a great number of California's politicians.  Several years ago the Cadiz project was not approved by the Met board.  It did not make sense.  With Katz installed it was perhaps an opportunity to resurrect the Cadiz project.  There were a series of very-close votes.  Katz almost won the position. 
 
However, Met board members wisely hired Jeff Kightlinger, Met's general counsel for the past four years, to become the 13th general manager in the agency’s 78-year history.  Mr. Kightlinger, as all of Met GMs, faces tremendous challenges in managing the imported water supplies in Southern California.  It is nice to know the Met board stuck with hiring someone who has a good background on water resources.  We should all wish Mr. Kightlinger success in his efforts to improve Southern California's water resources management.  I am sure the current Met board chairman, Wes Bannister, from Orange County, will keep Jeff on his toes and provide him with challenging ideas to pursue. Please don't be too hard on him Wes.
 
Peripheral Canal - The Peripheral Canal is the final bow on the package of projects planned to complete the State Water Project. There is renewed interest in completing this project. It basically includes construction of a canal to bring water from the Sacramento River, north of the San Francisco-Bay Delta, around/peripheral to the Delta and Sacramento area for delivery to the (Harvey) Banks Pumping Plant by Tracy.  From the Banks Pumping Plant water is lifted up to the start of the South Bay Aqueduct for delivery to water agencies in the South San Francisco Bay area.  "Banks" water is also lifted up to the start of the long California Aqueduct, where it flows by gravity down to the Bakersfield area.  From there the "State Project" water is lifted by more pumps up over the mountains to get water to the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara area "Coastal Branch" and to the "West Branch" to supply Met.
 
The project cost to complete construction of the Peripheral Canal was estimated to be about $10 billion by Ralph Torres, a CA DWR senior manager, at one of our AWRA SoCal Section dinner meetings in 2002.  Since that time the California DWR "State Water Project Planning Office", was renamed to something like the "Bay-Delta/CalFED Agency". This was essentially a blow to the idea that the Peripheral Canal would ever be completed.  However, the Peripheral Canal is a great idea, that will serve the water quality and water supply interests for over 28 million of the 37 million people in our state.  This includes 22 million in Southern California and 6 million folks in the South San Francisco Bay area. 
 
However, Met is not showing much leadership, or is tired of promoting the idea of the Peripheral Canal over the last couple of decades.  Staff are not actively promoting the idea to build the Peripheral Canal.  Everyone has continued to point to the defeat of the 1982 state bond initiative to fund the completion of the Peripheral Canal as the conclusion the public did/does not want it.  The repetition of this idea as fact is wrong.  In the early 1980s we about half the number of people in our state and had several years with far-above average rainfall.  Therefore, the public may have been apathetic in not seeing the need for the Peripheral Canal.  With the upcoming federal illegal-immigration amnesty plan proceeding, we can expect a continued high population growth that will advance the stress to our limited water supplies, infrastructure and also energy supplies to pump our water all over the place. A public-education program to explain to people in Southern California that we do not get all of our tap water from the Colorado River will help.  Every water resources professional in Southern California should be able to explain where their water comes from.  Do you know where your water comes from?  If not, find out and share with your neighbors.  Here is a link to our AWRA SoCal Section logo showing California's main water supply conveyance facilities to help you out.  There are links to more detailed images for parts of the state.

It is apparent Met is expecting cities throughout the state to ask for the Peripheral Canal to be built.  Perhaps if Met provided a PowerPoint presentation to each city council on completion of the "Peripheral Canal & the State Water Project" as educational material, and an example "Resolution supporting the "Peripheral Canal"" to pass and advertise to the state and federal government representatives we may see some action to complete construction of the Peripheral Canal.  Need any help Met?

Our next 2nd-Weds monthly meeting date is May 10th.  We will hold the meeting in Monterey, on the occasion of the Assoc. of California Water Agencies (ACWA) semi-annual conference.  This will be our farthest-north meeting location.  It will be an opportunity to meet the mainly-governmental water resources professionals.  Most academic and consulting water resources professionals cannot take the time to go to Monterey during the middle of the week. 

Tentative topics include:  (1) The State Water Project - Peripheral Canal:  Time to Do It - It Makes More Sense than Ever & (2) Can Ocean Desalting be a Solution to Our New-Needed Water Supplies if there is Not Enough Energy? This dinner meeting may prove to be one of our most interesting.  Please feel free to come if you are at the ACWA Monterey meeting, or tell your friends to come.  We plan to have our AWRA SoCal Section May 10th meeting at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School facilities near the Monterey Convention Center.  It should be fun!

This Month - Update to the Ventura County Regional Groundwater Resources Management Plan and Use of Existing Ocean Outfall Pipelines for Wastewater Brine Disposal...

This month a couple of important water resources projects in Ventura County will be highlighted.  This includes (1) the update to the county management plan for the regional Fox Canyon Aquifer Groundwater Management Agency (GMA) and (2) ocean outfall issues for the Conejo-Calleguas Creek brine line being constructed by the Calleguas Municipal Water District. 
 

Our first speaker, David Panaro, R.G., is the Groundwater Manager for the County of Ventura, and also Staff Hydrologist for the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA), as both agencies are based in the Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) offices at the Ventura County Government Center in Ventura, CaliforniaDavid Panaro has over 20 years experience in the soils, geology, geotechnical engineering, and hydrology aspects of VenturaCounty water resources.  He obtained his B.A. degree in Earth Science with an emphasis in Geology from CalStateUniversity, Northridge.  David has worked for the County of Ventura since 1991, and is a California Registered Geologist.

 

The Fox Canyon Aquifer is the County's most important groundwater reservoir and generally underlies most of coastal Ventura County at depths ranging from about 500 to 2000 feet below ground surface.  It is exposed to the ocean up to several miles off shore.  The seawater-freshwater interface in the shallower aquifers is found below much of the coastline and is reaching further inland due to overpumping.  However, the freshwater-seawater interface in deeper the Fox Canyon Aquifer basically remains offshore.  The GMA has a management plan that currently needs to be updated, from when it was created over 20 years ago. 

 

The update to the GMA plan has a lot to accomplish.  For example, there are some concepts/ideas that need to be incorporated into the plan that embrace new water treatment technologies, and other ideas updated to perhaps simplify the plan's overly-complex and antiquated management of water resources using the "safe yield" concept.  Now, use and reuse of wastewater is becoming more important, since it is clear we have limited imported surface water supplies available.  As management of coastal Ventura County water resources continues to be dominated by agricultural interests, it may take a couple of decades for the public water agencies to actually get to invest and build the infrastructure for the long-term management of the local water supplies. Once the farmers mine-out the groundwater supplies and sell their land to homeowners, the public will fund construction of the needed water resources management projects to fix what the farmers did.  Don't get me started...As an expert on coastal seawater intrusion control/management I think Ventura County has a long list of projects they need to complete to protect their groundwater supplies.  I trust David Panaro will share ideas to the GMA update plan that live within the current political environment and looks forward to when the land use in the area has converted from farming to urban interests.

 

Our second speaker and host, Don Kendall, PhD, PE, is the General Manager for the Calleguas Municipal Water District (Calleguas).  He has been working hard over the last ten years to complete construction of a "regional brine line" in eastern Ventura County.  It generally runs along the Conejo-Calleguas Creek streambed alignment, consisting of a large diameter high-density polyethylene (HDPE).  Brine from wastewater treatment processes and wastewater from the upstream areas are planned to be transported by this pipeline from the Moorpark area to the Ventura coast.  The main purpose in building this pipeline is to address the level of elevated chlorides found in water delivered by Met to Calleguas, with additional chlorides naturally added to the water by sweat after it is used by the public and chlorine added to disinfect the wastewater before it leaves as effluent from a treatment plant.  The farmers that brought this issue up to the LA Regional Water Quality Control Board did a good job diverting attention to this chloride issue affecting the growth of their crops, than have the board dwell on their contamination of the groundwater basins and streams from their use of nitrate fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.

 

Calleguas has the opportunity of using potentially two existing ocean outfall pipelines.  They include one belonging to the City of Port Hueneme, which has a design with multiple diffusion holes to allow broad mixing of outfall water with ocean water.  The other belongs to the nearby Reliant Energy power plant.  Calleguas plans to use both outfall pipelines to manage its brine disposal issues.  There has been some regulatory concerns with disposal of brine water to ocean outfalls.  Many studies on these concerns have shown them to be insignificant, considering the vast quantity of ocean water, allowing the projects to continue.  Most of the studies have focused on water quality issues.  It is interesting that many issues we have with quality of fresh water supplies, are non-issues with relation to seawater quality.  For example, common metals found in fresh water simply precipitate out in the sediments as they encounter the salty/super-saturated conditions of seawater.

 

As our population continues to grow in Southern California we will continue to see the need for construction of regional brine lines to move salts from the upper parts of our watersheds to ocean outfall pipelines.  We only have the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) pipeline brine line network in the Santa Ana River Watershed as a prime example of how many agencies in a watershed cooperated to complete its construction and operation.  We cannot have very salty water in our groundwater basins, otherwise, they will rapidly become unusable as water supplies.  We have to move our salts out to sustain our water supplies.  There is a growing concern with regulators that the transport of brine out of the watersheds by pipelines will remove water flow in streambeds and harm their ecosystems or have no water for fish.  These issues will continue to bring up the idea of "Valuing Water", valuing it simply as a commodity or grasping the concepts of value for other uses, such as aesthetics, ecosystem enhancement/maintenance, for quality-of-life needs. 

 

Looking forward to the upcoming April 10th dinner meeting in Thousand Oaks at the Calleguas MWD headquarters.  Hope to see you there.  If you cannot attend please let other folks know about this event that you think might be interested.  It is another great opportunity to Make Connections with California's Water People and Ideas!

 

Last Month -OCWD/OCSD Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System and MWDOC Dana Point Pilot Ocean Water Desalting Project
Last month we were pleased to highlight a couple of the most important water resources development projects in Southern California.  This included the Ground Water Replenishment (GWR) System, a $600 million public capital facilities improvement project currently under major construction. It was developed over the last 20 years and is funded primarily by the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District, to greatly enhance the portfolio of water supplies available in the northern 2/3rds of Orange County.  The Municipal Water District of Orange County is pursuing the significant opportunity of developing a water supply from desalting ocean water in the coastal Dana Point area, the southern 1/3rd of Orange County. 
 
Our speakers include Shivaji Deshmukh, P.E., Assistant Director of Engineering from OCWD and Richard Bell, Principal Engineer from MWDOC.  Shivaji Deshmukh has been dedicated to the planning and development of pilot studies and full implementation of the GWR System facilities for about eight years.  Richard Bell has over 25 years of experience in engineering and water resources development projects in Orange County and is managing the feasibility study to desalt ocean water from deep wells along the Dana Point beach area.
 
Once the major construction is completed by summer 2007, the GRW System will be the largest MF/RO/UV wastewater (sewer water) treatment plant of its kind in the world. Water produced from the Groundwater Replenishment System will undergo one of the world's most advanced, state-of-the-art, purification processes. Water will be purified using a three-step process of microfiltration (MF), reverse osmosis (RO) and ultraviolet light (UV) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) treatment techniques. Taken together there will be a 6- to 9-log reduction in microbial viability and some calcium salts will have to be added to keep the highly-purified RO water from corroding the transmission pipeline.  Present chlorination-disinfection of our drinking water supplies account for a 1/2- to 1-log reduction in microbial viability.  UV light alone has been proven to have a 3- to 4-log reduction factor, far exceeding the common chlorination process.
 
The purpose of the GWR System is to provide for a reliable supply of new water to the Orange County area.  A total of 100 million gallons per day of purified water will be produced by the GWR System by the year 2020.  The start of the GWR System may produce about 60 MGD by 2007. The GWR System takes the place of the OCWD Water Factory 21 plant decommissioned in 2004. 
 
Water Factory 21 was used continuously since 1976 to produce purified water from highly-treated wastewater from OCSD and injected into an original series of 81-multi-depth seawater intrusion barrier wells at 24 locations along Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley.  Water Factory 21 was the first large-scale plant to treat wastewater using RO and GAC treatment processes for up to 14 MGD.  The water from the plant was blended with colored groundwater from deep aquifers beneath the main producing clear-water aquifers a short distance to the north of the barrier.  Orange County is fortunate/unfortunate to have the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone along the coastline, which uplifted geologic units along the coastline and essentially acts as a barrier to seawater intrusion.  Seawater is in hydraulic communication with the main freshwater aquifers in Orange County at a few areas along the coast, where the ancestral Santa Ana, San Gabriel and Los Angeles Rivers have cut across the coastline and deposited geologically recent permeable sands and gravels. 
 
OCWD, the Water Replenishment District of Southern California (in LA County), the Central Basin & West Basin Municipal Water Districts and the Los Angeles Department of Public Works (formerly the Flood Control and Water Conservation District) all take part in control of seawater intrusion prevention operations through the use of an extensive network of seawater barrier injection wells.  About 10 years ago LA County began to use about 20 MGD of RO treated wastewater for seawater intrusion barrier injection wells.  Before that the LA County barrier wells used imported surface water supplies.  OCWD started using reclaimed wastewater 20 years before LA did.
 
The GWR System water will be used to inject in the existing older (circa 1974) set of injection wells, the expanded newer injection wells along the coast and also pumped up about 250 feet in elevation 13 miles up along the Santa Ana River to be percolated into the forebay area of the regional Orange County Groundwater Basin.  All of the new injection have been constructed.  About third of the 13-mile long pipeline has been completed.  The remaining sections of the pipeline should be completed by August 2007.  The idea behind the GWR System started about 20 years ago at OCWD.  I love it when a plan comes together.
 
The GWR System, like the OCWD Water Factory 21 plant, is expected to be the leading world-recognized example of how to complete a project of this magnitude and complexity.  Although OCWD water users and OCSD rate payers are funding the main share of the costs for GWR System, it has been financially subsidized (perhaps not heavily enough) and supported by federal, state and regional agencies.  Federal agencies include the U.S. EPA, and the US Bureau of Reclamation.  State agencies include the California Department of Water Resources, California Department of Health Services and the Santa Ana Region California Water Resource Control Board.  The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has also provided grants for various aspects of the GWR System components.  OCWD and OCSD have been fortunate in the great amount of public support and creative ideas from staff at public agencies, leading academic institutions and private consultants.  In large part due to a relentless public outreach program by OCWD,so far no significant public opposition has been evident.  This public information outreach program should be another example of how to proceed with other similar programs. The success of the GWR System should encourage other Southern California public agencies involved in wastewater reuse to increase their investments in advanced RO treatment processes.  The recent LA Times articles pointing out the presence of minute concentrations of pharmaceutical compounds from use of less advanced-treated water for groundwater recharge is certainly an encouragement.  Especially if the outraged public comes to board of directors meetings.
 
The MWDOC Dana Point Ocean Water Desalination Project Feasibility Study covers the effort of identifying the potential new source of drinking water from desalting ocean water derived from pumping deep groundwater wells along the Dana Point beach area.  The southern third of Orange County has many narrow valleys and a less dense population than the flat coastal plane and highly dense population in the north part of the county.  The north has the vast Orange County Groundwater Basin.  The south has very little in the way of groundwater supplies and is mainly dependent on imported water supplies provided by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan).  MWDOC is the Metropolitan member agency representing most cities/areas of Orange County, except for the cities of Fullerton, Anaheim and Santa Ana.  MWDOC, next to the San Diego County Water Authority, purchases the most water from Metropolitan.  This includes treated water delivered directly to communities through Metropolitan's regional pipelines and untreated water sold to and used to recharge the Orange County Groundwater Basins through the OCWD percolation basins along the Santa Ana River in Anaheim.  Taken together MWDOC and OCWD manage the water supplies for the 3 million people living in Orange County.  You might naturally think OCWD has something to do with water resources in all of Orange County.  However, OCWD is simply the groundwater basin management agency for the main basin. 
 
MWDOC has the responsibility to plan for the water resources management throughout Orange County, and works closely with OCWD to leverage resources and influence in Sacramento and Washington, D.C.  The south Orange County area, being more reliant on the imported surface water supplies, may be seen as more vulnerable to potential water shortages.  The Dana Point Ocean Water Desalination Project is one of the many potential projects being evaluated by MWDOC.  (PDF-copy of January presentation on Dana Point Pilot Project.) Richard Bell, principal engineer from MWDOC, will describe the status of the project and several of the water quality and engineering issues that need to be addressed in the course of the ongoing feasibility study.  One of the issues relates to how iron and manganese evident in the local groundwater along the beach area may precipitate and plug the wells.  Often the issue of completing and ocean outfall and the impact of highly saline water to the ocean water is a concern for environmental and engineering feasibility.  These same issues are being explored for this project.  It is not certain whether the project may have to be modified from the current plan.
 
There is also a potential funding issue for this MWDOC desalting project.  Tentative plans include raising the MWDOC fee for the wholesale sale of water to the Orange County member agencies.  However, OCWD is by-far the largest customer of MWDOC-Met water and would be burdened with funding this MWDOC project in the south Orange County area, far outside of the OCWD main groundwater basin service area.  It will be difficult to convince the OCWD board to agree to such a significant increase in MWDOC fees.  OCWD may seek purchasing water from other member agencies to meet its needs.